What is the Actual House Edge on Blackjack?

Retrieved 21 May I know of one major casino in Vegas that assumes a 0. However, if the rules do not allow you to pair split after doubling down no das , the correct basic playing strategy is as follows:. This is one of the worst ideas you can have. Casino game Game of chance Game of skill List of bets.


Five Ways To Get The Edge in Blackjack

Do you want the edge over the casino when you play blackjack? Getting the edge is not as difficult as you think. At the minimum, you must be playing the basic playing strategy and play only blackjack games that have good rules. If you do this, you will reduce the house edge to 0.

Here are five ways to do this. However, keep this in mind: In addition, in the short term, your bankroll will fluctuate up and down; therefore, you need to have enough bankroll to prevent going broke when a negative swing occurs.

Here is where you can obtain information about these systems: Different casinos use different models for estimating the number of hands a player plays per hour for comping purposes. The range is hands per hour on the high side , and on the low side.

In addition, by playing at a crowded table you can reduce the number of hands played per hour. You can also slow down your play by taking your time making a playing decision, and taking a few breaks every hour bathroom, cell phone call, etc. The comping policies of your local casino may be slightly different from the above example.

However, the principle remains the same. For more tips on how to get more comps than you actually deserve, consult the following books: There are other types of gambling coupons where you have the edge when you use them; for example, a coupon that pays you 2 to 1 on your blackjack or one where your first card is a valuable Ace. There are several sources where you can get gambling coupons. In these cases the additional money wagered is not figured into the denominator for the purpose of determining the house edge, thus increasing the measure of risk.

The reason that the house edge is relative to the original wager, not the average wager, is that it makes it easier for the player to estimate how much they will lose. For example if a player knows the house edge in blackjack is 0.

Most players are not going to know how much their average wager will be in games like blackjack relative to the original wager, thus any statistic based on the average wager would be difficult to apply to real life questions. The conventional definition can be helpful for players determine how much it will cost them to play, given the information they already know.

However the statistic is very biased as a measure of risk. In Caribbean stud poker, for example, the house edge is 5. However the ratio of average money lost to average money wagered in Caribbean stud is only 2. The player only looking at the house edge may be indifferent between roulette and Caribbean stud poker, based only the house edge. If one wants to compare one game against another I believe it is better to look at the ratio of money lost to money wagered, which would show Caribbean stud poker to be a much better gamble than roulette.

I personally opt to include ties although I respect the other definition. For purposes of comparing one game to another I would like to propose a different measurement of risk, which I call the "element of risk.

For bets in which the initial bet is always the final bet there would be no difference between this statistic and the house edge. Bets in which there is a difference are listed below. The standard deviation is a measure of how volatile your bankroll will be playing a given game.

This statistic is commonly used to calculate the probability that the end result of a session of a defined number of bets will be within certain bounds. The standard deviation of the final result over n bets is the product of the standard deviation for one bet see table and the square root of the number of initial bets made in the session. This assumes that all bets made are of equal size. The probability that the session outcome will be within one standard deviation is The probability that the session outcome will be within two standard deviations is The probability that the session outcome will be within three standard deviations is The following table shows the probability that a session outcome will come within various numbers of standard deviations.

I realize that this explanation may not make much sense to someone who is not well versed in the basics of statistics. If this is the case I would recommend enriching yourself with a good introductory statistics book. Although I do not mention hold percentages on my site the term is worth defining because it comes up a lot.

The hold percentage is the ratio of chips the casino keeps to the total chips sold. This is generally measured over an entire shift.

House Edge